3 ways to check NIRS data quality

1 min read

Before performing any data analysis, we should check the data quality first. Below are 3 ways to do so.

1. Visual check of the time series

The best pattern detector is our eyes and brains! In many cases, if we visually see the data, we know what is wrong. You may use the method and program in this post to plot the time courses of all channels (not just one).

Visual data quality check of NIRS time courses
Visual data quality check of NIRS time courses

In the plot above, all 48 channels are plotted together (the y-axis). We can clearly see two types of noise:

  1. The spikes which occur in most channels after time point 7000. These spikes are caused by head motion.
  2. The high noise level in the “red” channels (channels 39, 34, 31). This is more evident if we plot the variance of each channel (figure below). As we can easily see, the variance of channels 39, 34 and 31 is much higher than other channels.

    Variance vs Channel
    Variance vs Channel

2. Existence of the “heart-beat” band

If the NIRS signal was acquired well, then the heart beating signal should be captured, leaving a bright brand in the frequency ~1Hz in the wavelet transform plot, just like the left plot in the figure below (the band close to period 8). If there is no such band, it does not necessarily mean the signal is trash, but you need to be cautious. To use the wavelet transform toolbox, please download here: https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1561


NIRS wavelet
NIRS wavelet
Example:
figure;wt(hbo(:,1))

3. Correlation between hbo and hbr

The third way is to check the correlation between hbo and hbr. They are supposed to have negative correlation, at least in young healthy subjects. If not, or if they have perfect negative correlation (-1), then they might contain too much noise. We have a separate article on this method. Please check out https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1767

Correlation between oxy and deoxy-Hb
Correlation between oxy and deoxy-Hb

Below is the scripts used for the 3 methods.

[hbo,hbr,mark]=readHitachData('SA06_MES_Probe1.csv');

figure;plotTraces(hbr,1:52,mark)

figure;wt(hbo(:,1))

for ii=1:52; wt(hbo(:,ii)); pause; end

[badchannels] = checkDataQuality(hbo,hbr);

Do you have other ways to check data quality? Please let me know!



写作助手,把中式英语变成专业英文


AI writing papers with real references


Want to receive new post notification? 有新文章通知我

第七十期fNIRS Journal Club视频 李日辉团队

Youtube: https://youtu.be/tpP3Cge6T0M 优酷:https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUxNzc2Njc4OA==.html?playMo
Wanling Zhu
28 sec read

第七十期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/3/7, 10am 李日辉团队

传统fNIRS测量由于通道距离单一,干扰源多,存在空间分辨率不足,信号有效成分低的缺点。来自澳门大学的李日辉团队将分享基于多距离、高密度fNIRS的DOT成像技术,并通过单脑运动和双人社交互动范式验证
Wanling Zhu
22 sec read

第六十九期fNIRS Journal Club视频 赵伟华课题组

Youtube: https://youtu.be/VKMgJT9oESI 优酷: https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUxMzkzOTkyNA==.html?playM
Wanling Zhu
17 sec read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *