Games used in human brain research [2]

1 min read

Previous post “Games used in human brain research [1]”

The finger tapping task mentioned in the last post is rather boring. How interesting it is to move fingers? So in this post I will talk about a more interesting task: competitive button pressing.

In this task, the number of subjects is 2. Two people sit side by side in front of a computer screen. In each trial, a gray circle appears indicating “ready”. After a few seconds, the gray circle is filled with green, indicating “go”. Upon seeing the “go” signal, the two subjects have to press buttons as quickly as possible. Subject A presses button A, and subject B presses button B. Then the computer records which subject is faster (winner). The trial repeats for 20 times. The numbers in the above description can vary.

This task is used in our recent hyperscanning study where we scan two people’s brains at the same time when they play games together. The above competition game is one of the games. This seemingly very simple game is actually very interesting because people want to win their peers. Another game they played, called cooperation game where they have to cooperate to win, is less interesting.

This task is simply a two-people version of the classic reaction time task. Reaction time of human is an interesting subject to scientists, as it is a measure of how fast signal is processed in the brain (from eye to brain to motor output). The world-class sprinter can have reaction time as small as 180ms. That means if you find your subject’s reaction time is smaller than 180ms, you should be careful of the data (or excited about your subject).

It should be noted that the duration between ‘ready’ and ‘go’ signal is a factor influencing the reaction time. The longer the duration, the shorter the reaction time. Check out this paper. Also, to reduce subjects’ ability to predict the timing of “go”, it’s better to randomize the duration between ‘ready’ and ‘go’.

btw, Do you know that intelligence is correlated with reaction time? The faster, the smarter.

Dan and I were playing a competition game
Dan and I were playing a competition game




写作助手,把中式英语变成专业英文


AI writing papers with real references


Want to receive new post notification? 有新文章通知我

第七十六期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/11/14, 10am 周思远博士

文化经验会影响个体如何理解和解释世界,但短暂跨文化交流能否改变思维?这种变化又体现在哪些认知加工层面?来自四川师范大学的周思远博士将分享一项结合fNIRS超扫描、眼动追踪与自然语言处理的研究,其通过比
Wanling Zhu
10 sec read

第七十五期fNIRS Journal Club视频 张浩云团队

Youtube: https://youtu.be/MB3nIDg4fMo 优酷:https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjU3Nzk4MDA0OA==.html 语言学习本质
Wanling Zhu
19 sec read

第七十五期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/10/10, 10am 张浩云团队

语言学习本质上是社会性、交互性的过程,但现有对其神经机制的研究大多仅从学习者个体层面开展。来自澳门大学的张浩云团队将分享一项fNIRS超扫描研究,探讨语言学习中师生互动的神经机制,包括师生神经同步如何
Wanling Zhu
14 sec read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *