SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression

1 min read

One particular nice thing about SVR is that the weight of each feature reflects the feature’s true contribution. If some features are highly correlated (this is common in neuroimaging data – e.g. adjacent voxel activity are very similar), you expect that the corresponding weights to be similar. SVR exactly does that. Linear regression, on the other hand, will give big weight to the feature which is best correlated to the dependent variable (y). Here is a demonstration in MatLab.

In the following simulation, we have 10 features which are highly correlated (see figure below).

Correlation between features
Correlation between features

And the variable to be predicted is fairly nicely correlated with the features. Below I plotted the weight of 10 features. The blue curve is for SVR, and the red is for linear regression. As you can see, the weight for SVR is smooth and balanced, but the weight for regression is like ‘winner takes all’, the 1st feature has a big weight but others very small.

Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)
Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)

Here are the source code in MatLab. normalize.m can be found at https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1083

N = 1000;
M = 1;
t = randn(N,1);

clear r
m = 10;%1:10:100;
for M = m
x = [t];
for ii=1:M-1
    x = [x  t+ii*randn(N,1)/10];
end

x = normalize(x);

% t1 = randn(N,1);
% t2 = randn(N,1);
% x = [t1 t2];
% y = 3*t1 - 5*t2;
y = 2*t + randn(N,1)/2 + 0;

% corrcoef([x y]);
%
% b= glmfit(x,y);
for ii = 1
    for jj=1
        tic;model = svmtrain(y(1:N/2),x(1:N/2,:),['-s 4 -t 0 -n ' num2str(ii/2) ' -c ' num2str(1)]);toc
        tic;zz=svmpredict(y(N/2+1:end),x(N/2+1:end,:),model);toc
        tmp = corrcoef(zz, y(N/2+1:end));
        r(M) = tmp(2);
    end
end

w = model.SVs' * model.sv_coef;
b = -model.rho;
b1 = [w]

% regression
b2 = glmfit(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2,:));
yy = x(N/2+1:end,:)*b2(2:end) + b2(1);
b2 = b2(2:end)

sum((zz - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)
sum((yy - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)

end

figure('color','w');imagesc(corrcoef(x));colorbar
caxis([0 1])
figure('color','w');plot(b1,'o-');hold on;plot(b2,'o-r');xlabel('feature index');ylabel('weight')

return

hold on;plot(m, r, 'ro-');xlabel('# of dimension'); ylabel('r')
figure('color','w');plot(m, r, 'ro-');

figure('color','w');plot(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2), 'b.');
hold on;plot(x(N/2+1:end,:), zz, 'r.');
xlabel('x')
ylabel('y')
legend({'training','test'})

%figure('color','w'); plot(zz, y(N/2+1:end), '.'); axis equal;axis square;
%figure('color','w'); plot(zz - y(N/2+1:end), '.')




写作助手,把中式英语变成专业英文


AI writing papers with real references


Want to receive new post notification? 有新文章通知我

第七十六期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/11/14, 10am 周思远博士

文化经验会影响个体如何理解和解释世界,但短暂跨文化交流能否改变思维?这种变化又体现在哪些认知加工层面?来自四川师范大学的周思远博士将分享一项结合fNIRS超扫描、眼动追踪与自然语言处理的研究,其通过比
Wanling Zhu
10 sec read

第七十五期fNIRS Journal Club视频 张浩云团队

Youtube: https://youtu.be/MB3nIDg4fMo 优酷:https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjU3Nzk4MDA0OA==.html 语言学习本质
Wanling Zhu
19 sec read

第七十五期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/10/10, 10am 张浩云团队

语言学习本质上是社会性、交互性的过程,但现有对其神经机制的研究大多仅从学习者个体层面开展。来自澳门大学的张浩云团队将分享一项fNIRS超扫描研究,探讨语言学习中师生互动的神经机制,包括师生神经同步如何
Wanling Zhu
14 sec read

2 Replies to “SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression”

  1. Very interesting. I was running into a similar problem with regression and wonder what the underlying reason for the winner takes all phenomenon is. Do you know more about it?
    Thanks,
    Henning

  2. Great article!

    e-SVR seems also to work great on Binary Classification Problems like pedestrian detection (Better than SVC…). I am a bit confused since Regression is for continuous output whereas Classification is discrete-oriented. Could you give me some insights about that (SVR vs SVC) ?

    Cheers,

    Djébril

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *