SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression

1 min read

One particular nice thing about SVR is that the weight of each feature reflects the feature’s true contribution. If some features are highly correlated (this is common in neuroimaging data – e.g. adjacent voxel activity are very similar), you expect that the corresponding weights to be similar. SVR exactly does that. Linear regression, on the other hand, will give big weight to the feature which is best correlated to the dependent variable (y). Here is a demonstration in MatLab.

In the following simulation, we have 10 features which are highly correlated (see figure below).

Correlation between features
Correlation between features

And the variable to be predicted is fairly nicely correlated with the features. Below I plotted the weight of 10 features. The blue curve is for SVR, and the red is for linear regression. As you can see, the weight for SVR is smooth and balanced, but the weight for regression is like ‘winner takes all’, the 1st feature has a big weight but others very small.

Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)
Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)

Here are the source code in MatLab. normalize.m can be found at https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1083

N = 1000;
M = 1;
t = randn(N,1);

clear r
m = 10;%1:10:100;
for M = m
x = [t];
for ii=1:M-1
    x = [x  t+ii*randn(N,1)/10];
end

x = normalize(x);

% t1 = randn(N,1);
% t2 = randn(N,1);
% x = [t1 t2];
% y = 3*t1 - 5*t2;
y = 2*t + randn(N,1)/2 + 0;

% corrcoef([x y]);
%
% b= glmfit(x,y);
for ii = 1
    for jj=1
        tic;model = svmtrain(y(1:N/2),x(1:N/2,:),['-s 4 -t 0 -n ' num2str(ii/2) ' -c ' num2str(1)]);toc
        tic;zz=svmpredict(y(N/2+1:end),x(N/2+1:end,:),model);toc
        tmp = corrcoef(zz, y(N/2+1:end));
        r(M) = tmp(2);
    end
end

w = model.SVs' * model.sv_coef;
b = -model.rho;
b1 = [w]

% regression
b2 = glmfit(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2,:));
yy = x(N/2+1:end,:)*b2(2:end) + b2(1);
b2 = b2(2:end)

sum((zz - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)
sum((yy - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)

end

figure('color','w');imagesc(corrcoef(x));colorbar
caxis([0 1])
figure('color','w');plot(b1,'o-');hold on;plot(b2,'o-r');xlabel('feature index');ylabel('weight')

return

hold on;plot(m, r, 'ro-');xlabel('# of dimension'); ylabel('r')
figure('color','w');plot(m, r, 'ro-');

figure('color','w');plot(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2), 'b.');
hold on;plot(x(N/2+1:end,:), zz, 'r.');
xlabel('x')
ylabel('y')
legend({'training','test'})

%figure('color','w'); plot(zz, y(N/2+1:end), '.'); axis equal;axis square;
%figure('color','w'); plot(zz - y(N/2+1:end), '.')



写作助手,把中式英语变成专业英文


AI writing papers with real references


Want to receive new post notification? 有新文章通知我

第七十期fNIRS Journal Club视频 李日辉团队

Youtube: https://youtu.be/tpP3Cge6T0M 优酷:https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUxNzc2Njc4OA==.html?playMo
Wanling Zhu
28 sec read

第七十期fNIRS Journal Club通知2026/3/7, 10am 李日辉团队

传统fNIRS测量由于通道距离单一,干扰源多,存在空间分辨率不足,信号有效成分低的缺点。来自澳门大学的李日辉团队将分享基于多距离、高密度fNIRS的DOT成像技术,并通过单脑运动和双人社交互动范式验证
Wanling Zhu
22 sec read

第六十九期fNIRS Journal Club视频 赵伟华课题组

Youtube: https://youtu.be/VKMgJT9oESI 优酷: https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUxMzkzOTkyNA==.html?playM
Wanling Zhu
17 sec read

2 Replies to “SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression”

  1. Very interesting. I was running into a similar problem with regression and wonder what the underlying reason for the winner takes all phenomenon is. Do you know more about it?
    Thanks,
    Henning

  2. Great article!

    e-SVR seems also to work great on Binary Classification Problems like pedestrian detection (Better than SVC…). I am a bit confused since Regression is for continuous output whereas Classification is discrete-oriented. Could you give me some insights about that (SVR vs SVC) ?

    Cheers,

    Djébril

Leave a Reply to djebril Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *